Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04879
Original file (BC 2013 04879.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04879

			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 




APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Reentry (RE) code “2X” (First-term, second-term or career 
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the 
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to a “1” 
series.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He fulfilled his service contract; however, the differences 
within his chain of command resulted in an unjust RE Code and 
would like it corrected.

He admits to falling behind on his Star Card account for which 
he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) and Unfavorable 
Information File (UIF).

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.




STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 10 Jun 
2008.

On 9 Feb 10, the applicant received a Referral Enlisted 
Performance Report (EPR) for a “Does Not Meet” in Section III, 
Block 2, Standards, Conduct, Character & Military Bearing.  The 
reason listed was “Irregular work ethic; received LOR for being 
late to duty 4 times/LOR from Flight Chief for missed 
appointment”.  

On 17 Feb 10, the applicant submitted a response to the Referral 
EPR.  On 22 Feb 10, the applicant’s additional rater carefully 
considered his response and the applicant received an overall “3 
- Average” rating.  

On 9 Feb 11, the applicant received a Referral EPR for a “Does 
Not Meet” in Section III, Block 2, Standards, Conduct, Character 
& Military Bearing.  The reason listed was “Untruthful behavior; 
chooses not to follow standards—received LOR for lying about 
dorm room inspection/having dog in room”.  The applicant elected 
not to provide comments to the referral.  The applicant received 
an overall “2 – Needs Improvement” rating. 

On 22 Feb 11, the applicant received a LOR for failing to pay 
just debts.  The applicant submitted a statement on his behalf 
apologizing for his financial negligence and agreed to keep 
better track of his financial responsibilities. 

On 1 Mar 11, the applicant’s supervisor and commander non-
recommended him for reenlistment under the Selective 
Reenlistment Program (SRP) for constantly failing to adhere to 
Air Force standards and behavior.  The applicant acknowledged 
receipt on the same day.  On 4 Mar 11, the applicant notified 
his commander he did not intent to appeal the decision.

On 31 May 11, the applicant was furnished an honorable 
discharge, and was credited with 2 years, 11 months, and 21 days 
of active service.   

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    




AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  

The applicant was discharged on 31 May 11 under the Fiscal Year 
2011 Air Force - Force Shaping Rollback Program.  The 
applicant’s RE Code was updated to “2X” based on his non-
selection for reenlistment.

AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, states 
commanders have the selective reenlistment selection or non-
selection authority.  The SRP considers the applicant’s Enlisted 
Performance Report(EPR) ratings, unfavorable information from 
any substantiated source, the airman’s willingness to comply 
with the Air Force’s standards and/or the airman’s ability (or 
lack of) to meet required training and duty performance levels.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.




APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

He contends that although he was not a perfect Airman, he was 
singled out and treated unfairly.  He acknowledged he did not 
appeal his non-selection for reenlistment.  His decision was 
based on fear of repercussion from his superiors.  

His only documented infraction was an instance of financial 
irresponsibility.  He does not feel that his forced separation 
was justified and his RE Code of “2X” is unfair.   The only 
thing he wishes to gain from changing this code is the 
opportunity to reenlist into the armed forces.  




THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission, to include his 
rebuttal comments, in judging the merits of the case; however, 
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force 
office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale 
as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the 
victim of an error of injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the requested relief.

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-04879 in Executive Session on 21 Nov 14 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Feb 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 21 Apr 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Sep 14.
	Exhibit E.  Applicant’s letter, dated 4 Oct 14.


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05961

    Original file (BC 2012 05961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05961 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of “2X” (Career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program), as reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow him to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05961

    Original file (BC 2012 05961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05961 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of “2X” (Career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program), as reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow him to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01988

    Original file (BC 2014 01988.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any duty that requires him to report his arrest for DUI violates his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. On 10 Oct 12, the applicant’s commander issued him an LOR for failing to report his arrest to his security officer as required by DoD Regulation 5200.2-R, paragraph C9.1.4. On 11 Mar 13, in response to a request from the applicant, his referral EPR was amended to remove reference to the DUI, however, the EPR remained an overall “3” based upon the applicant’s failure to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03836

    Original file (BC-2012-03836.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, his chain of command fabricated two additional LORs in order to involuntarily dismiss him from the military, and then denied his reenlistment in Mar 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02189

    Original file (BC 2014 02189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02189 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. The rater’s comments state “Member elected not to provide comments to the referral memo dated 24 Nov 2010.” On 18 Feb 11, the applicant’s squadron commander did not select her for reenlistment stating she had received an Article 15 for drawing a sexual innuendo...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02205

    Original file (BC-2012-02205.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02205 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry Code (RE) of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed to 3V (Separated w/Vol Sep Incentive) so he can enlist in the Utah Air National Guard. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00594

    Original file (BC 2014 00594.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00594 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code and his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. On 11 Feb 13, the applicant was notified by his commander of his non-selection for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05829

    Original file (BC 2012 05829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05829 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to 1J (eligible to reenlist but elected to separate). The remaining relevant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05829

    Original file (BC 2012 05829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05829 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to 1J (eligible to reenlist but elected to separate). The remaining relevant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05874

    Original file (BC 2012 05874.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...